Saturday, April 28, 2007

Tell theTruth: Are You A Liar?

So when did you first realize our country was led by liars? Was there a particular incident, campaign or speech resulting in an epiphany? Did a cynical role model let you know our country’s decision makers could not be trusted to tell the truth?

For me it was at the age of fifteen in 1984. I was watching television when a campaign commercial for Mary Mochary, who challenged New Jersey incumbent Senator Bill Bradley, was aired. On screen appeared President Ronald Reagan sitting behind his desk at the oval office. I’ve tried to find a transcript or even footage of this commercial online but haven’t had any luck. So, I’m relying on memory.

As I remember it Reagan said, “I’m not the sort of fellow to tell another person how to vote, but I support Mary Mochary.” It was something like that. And Reagan had this self-effacing aw shucks expression when he said it. I later learned Reagan aired similarly scripted commercials on behalf of other Republican candidates that year.

It just amazed me how an American president, arguably the most political persona in the world could say with a straight face, “I’m not the sort of fellow to tell another person how to vote.” At fifteen I was politically aware. I knew Reagan was a former governor of California and had previously campaigned for president before defeating Jimmy Carter in 1980. Hence, this was somebody who told people who to vote for quite often.

The lie itself was harmless. It wasn’t about arms for hostages, the Contras or the phony war on drugs. Nevertheless, the memory stands out as the moment when I internalized how politicians would even shamelessly lie about small things. And we therefore had to listen to their words with critical ears because if they could lie about something small, a big lie was just around the corner.

Three years later, I was disillusioned when California Senator Alan Cranston was exposed as one of the infamous Keating Five. In the summer of ’86, I sent Cranston $100 which at seventeen wasn’t peanuts. Cranston was in a tough reelection fight and I admired his stance on nuclear disarmament. So in 1987, when I watched Senator Warren Rudman of New Hampshire who sat on the Senate Ethics Committee roughly question Cranston in public, I was devastated. I had believed in him.

In 1992 I supported Paul Tsongas for president. I disagreed with his economic positions but believed Tsongas was the most honest candidate seeking the Democratic Party’s nomination that year. Sadly, Tsongas wasn’t honest about his recovery from cancer and he died in 1997.

You get older and learn life isn’t always so black and white. None of us are pure and the best of us have moral lapses. And in a world of nuance, lies become easy to rationalize. Many of us lie in our personal and professional lives. We lie to our boss as our boss lies to us. We tell “white lies” to our family and friends. In the movie “The Departed,” Vera Farmiga’s character admitted she lied to keep things on an “even keel.” And she proceeded to live a lie while cheating on Matt Damon. Later she dumped Matt Damon upon learning about his lies. More often than not the “even keel” Farmiga’s character refers to are lies to preserve a self-serving image we’ve constructed.

In America our politicians and military leadership have lied for all kinds of reasons. In 1960, President Eisenhower was caught in a lie following the Gary Powers U2 spy plane incident. Embarrassing but Americans didn’t hold it against Eisenhower. It was the Cold War and the public believed their president had his heart in the right place about protecting our national security.

John Kennedy partly won the presidency in 1960 by lying about a “missile gap” with the Soviet Union that didn’t exist. President Lyndon Johnson lied about the pretext for war in Vietnam while his Pentagon misinformed the public about our "success." President Nixon lied about Vietnam as well as not being a crook and President Clinton practiced in front of mirror before telling the world, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.”

One person’s shit is another’s ice cream and some lies are considered necessary. Americans were largely in the dark about FDR’s polio and he lied about his true intentions during World War Two. He promised to keep America out and manipulated behind the scenes as best he could to put us in the conflict. Yet FDR’s place in history is secure. The Axis Powers had to be defeated to ensure our survival and a different president might have appeased Hitler. Hence we don’t judge FDR harshly for misleading about his health or war plans. FDR’s lies are deemed good lies.

Americans don't judge Clinton overly harshly either. Many of us are guilty of similar offenses and would’ve lied to protect our marriages, families and reputations. His testimony about the word “is” will always remain the butt of jokes but most Americans would gladly take him back. A friend recently confided to me that his marriage ended when his wife caught him in the act while he cheated on her. Unable to come up with a convincing lie he said, “honey it’s not what it looks like.” I don’t judge him harshly for it. Nor am I judgmental about Clinton or Vera Farmiga’s character. They didn’t lie maliciously. For them lies were shields against human frailty.

So, one could say that lies are simply part of the human condition and our leaders reflect this reality. Nonetheless, from my vantage point, a culture of destructive lying has become dangerously pervasive in recent years. This decade, corporations such as Enron shamelessly lied to their shareholders and dutiful employees, Jayson Blair hoodwinked the New York Times and Dick Cheney stood before the Republican Party National Convention in 2000 and promised the country a “stiff dose of the truth.”

Ironically, the same President Bush who promised a restoration of honor and integrity has become synonymous with lies – too many to summarize here. His Attorney General can’t keep track of his own lies. Former CIA director George Tenet has written a memoir whining about his “slam dunk” lie being taken out of context. And there are the shameful lies from the Pentagon about Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. If that's not bad enough, the Bush Administration is pathologically devoted to covering up evidence about global warming. From Kartina to Iraq, how many people have died because of all these lies? And how many more deaths are to come?

Recently, my Dad sagely observed to me in a telephone conversation, “None of this is new. I’ve seen all this stuff before. All politicians are full of it. They’ll always be full of it. That’s life.” Perhaps. And when it comes to life and politics, my Dad, like many Dads is a human oracle of experience and wisdom. But I remain optimistic because within this morass of deceit, a counter-culture of truth is emerging.

As our institutions and the mainstream media fail to deliver the truth, a hunger for reality is expressing itself among the people. Hence, we have the ascendancy of blogs. It’s undisciplined and irreverent out here. One has to be a discriminating consumer among thoughtful bloggers and those who are simply rhetorical bomb throwers. But there are golden nuggets of truth among ordinary people challenging elites about their destructive lies, disinformation and exploitation.

One of my favorite blogs may not be known to you and belongs to a dear personal friend, Kaiser Permanente – Corporate Ethics. My friend was an employee of Kaiser who lost her job because she’s an honest person. Her story is a long and complicated one and best learned from reading her blog. Her life is hard and she is unable to post as frequently as she’d like. Nonetheless, her site has become a repository for exposing the lies and cover-ups of Kaiser Permanente.

Not surprisingly, Kaiser mobilized their legal and PR machine to personally destroy her. But she perseveres as a courageous beacon of light against their greed culture of lies and malfeasance. More than once I observed to her that Kaiser reminds me of the Bush Administration. And as she put it to me once, “That’s because the people inside the Bush Administration come from corporate cultures such as Kaiser where truth can be tossed away like a can of tuna fish.” As only she could put it. It’s largely because of her inspiration I joined the blogosphere fray.

And there are the bloggers we know about such as JoshMarshall of Talking Points Memo, who pushed the story of the unscrupulous dismissal of the U.S. Attorneys. Marshall’s success at emphasizing a story the mainstream media initially ignored, illustrate how the façade of deceit so dutifully served and enabled by inside the beltway pundits such as David Broder, Joe Klein and David Brooks is finally cracking.

And I’m a part of it too in my own way. Of course I’m not the sort of fellow to tell another person how to vote.
My thanks to Mike Finnigan for including me in his most recent blogroundup on Crooks and Liars.


upinVermont said...

Hi Rob,

Your Dad is almost right.

Everyone famously thinks they are above average but in nearly every aspect of culture, conformity rather than originality is considered the hallmark of intelligence. Originality, though it may eventually be recognized, nearly always exacts a high price. Socrates and Jesus were both murdered for their originality.

Any number of *original* artists, composers, writers, poets, scientists were vilified or ignored in their own day. Mozart was far less successful than his less original contemporaries.

Politics, more so than most avocations, seems to be a meritocracy of the banal & insipid The qualities that are necessary for a man or woman to be elected are not necessarily the qualities needed for good governance.

To make a loose analogy, politicians are like any run-of-the-mill pop icon, they have a good voice, good hair but few of them could write their own music. Pop icons are the ultimate embodiment of conformity. Their music is written for them and is deliberately made to appeal to the least common denominator (and therefore the widest audience) -- making the music shallow, venal, insipid and wildly popular. Pop music, rather than trying to develop new ideas, seeks to exploit whatever is current and faddish. Once that particular cultural moment is gone, the music fades with it.

The Bush administration is the Milli Vanilli of its day. Rove finds his direct parallel in Frank Farian and Bush is Rab Morvan and Rob Pilatus wrapped into one person. Rove would understand my analogy to the very roots of his expedient little soul.

Unfortunately, when venal and banal men govern, then corruption, lying, equivocation, and expediency are almost inevitably the result. These are the traits of banality.

Every politician in power, literally, has won a popularity contest which is little different than a Miss America pageant. A few have won for the right reasons. Most have not. Bernie Sanders is an example of someone who, in my opinion, is in office for the right reasons. He doesn't say what's popular, he's an independent (a Socialist!), and he knows how many tits are on a cow. He doesn't whore himself out to lobbyists.

Great politicians who are also great statesmen, are few and far between - possibly once every generation. I think that almost everyone would agree that Lincoln falls into this category.

Those were different times though, before the age of TV and sound-bites. I don't know if Lincoln could be elected these days, but maybe.

I don't think there is a solution. If everyone is above average, then everyone is average. I suspect that most politicians, in terms of governance, are below average.

Their skills were in winning the beauty contest, not in managing the show. Their skills were in singing the songs, not writing them.

Nile said...

Wonderful essay, Rob. 'Twas by first visit to your blog, so I'm sure to be back. Happen to be reading Eric Alterman's delicious "When Presidents Lie" now, so your piece was a special treat.

J-Ro said...

Nice thoughts Rob. I've got a question for you. The fact that politicians lie isn't in dispute. But why do politicians lie? Is the system built in such a way that only liars rise to the top? Do we, as a voting public, put so much pressure on our leaders to be right and live in dangerous times that they are pressured into lying? Do the American people demand a liar President? Or do the American people just consistantly elect dishonest people?

Rob said...

Hi J-ro -

I would say any and all of the above. Partly it's because Americans want Champagne for the price of beer. Hence, politicians are forced to lie to some extent just to appease our want everything without paying for it mentality.

Also, as you suggest the system itself. Upinvermont makes incisive points that few politicians are statesman. And there is simple human fraility.

I realize lying is part of the game but when these folks lie about war and peace and global warming the people have to stand up and demand truth. Some of these lies cost lives.

J-Ro said...

I think you're right there Rob, few have the courage to stand up. I guess I was just going more philosophical and wondering if maybe somehow the system we have set up churns on these liars, or causes them to rise to the top.

I think certainly with politicians all over TV and other such mass media Americans put a premium on likability and charisma, which sometimes goes hand-in-hand with dishonesty and moral weakness.